On Sex Education
House Bill 4244: Responsible Parenthood, Reproductive Health, and Population and Development Bill
Section 3(o)
This Act declares it a guiding principle that a comprehensive reproductive health program addresses the needs of all people throughout their life cycle.
Are people always thinking about sex all the time 24 hours a day,
7 days a week, 365 days a year, beginning from their conception
up to their natural death? I beg to disagree that a new-born infant
needs a reproductive health program. A new-born baby does not
yet even have a good eyesight to see the things around him/her.
Why should a kid be addressed with a reproductive health program
by the State throughout his life cycle?
Section 4
Reproductive Health and Sexuality Education refers to a lifelong learning process of providing and acquiring complete, accurate and relevant information and education on reproductive health and sexuality through life skills education and other approaches
What are these life skills education? Is demonstrating how to put
on a condom using their mouths a "life skills education"? Is making
your pupil curious about how to insert an IUD in his classmate's
private organ also a "life skills education"?
Is penalizing your moral teachers including your parents, brothers
and sisters, and all the people who truly love you (whom you
consider as "maliciously engaging in disinformation" about the
provisions of this Act), with one to six months of imprisonment
or ten thousand to fifty thousand peso-fine or both such fine and
imprisonment "an other approach" for you to acquire information
on reproductive health and sexuality?
Sec. 16.
Age-appropriate Reproductive Health and Sexuality Education shall be taught by adequately trained teachers in formal and non-formal education system starting from Grade Five up to Fourth Year High School using life skills and other approaches.
Should your grade 5 son or daughter be taught about sex at
school at a time when you are detached from him/her, at a time
when you are out of sight? Is your fourth year brother or sister
ready to face the challenges of parenting, or abortion, when they
become pregnant out of curiosity on the "family planning" tools
called contraceptives, or through contraceptive failure? Do you
want your children, and all the other parents' children to be
taught sex and sexuality at a time when these innocent-minded
children still lack judgment on family, sexual and parenting life?
Do you want everyone in high school, who still need yet all the
wisdom of their parents, to disrespect them and their elders
because they, being high school students taught with Sex
Education, believe that they have all the right to have sex and
pretend to know everything about sex without asking the opinion
of their parents, by being secretive to their parents and not telling
them that these are what they are taught at school?
A page contained in the proposed Sex Education Module teaching a child that
he does not need to ask for permission from his parents.
Sec. 16.
Age-appropriate reproductive health and sexuality education shall be integrated in all relevant subjects.
Sex Education shall be integrated in all relevant subjects? In
Mathematics? In Chemistry? In Physics? In English? In Filipino?
In Araling Panlipunan? In Values Education? In Home
Economics? In Physical Education and Sports? Will the State
tell the students that all he has to learn while inside the classroom
is sex, sex, and more sex? That all he has to apply in his daily life
and "throughout his life cycle" is sex, sex, and more sex.
Are they going to have practicums also? How will the examinations
go? If they were allowed not to enter sex ed classes because of
their parents' convictions, does that mean that the pupils will
never have to attend any lecture or any examination of any subject
at any school at anytime anymore because Sex Education shall
already be integrated in all relevant subjects?
Sec. 16.
The DepEd, CHED, DSWD, TESDA and DOH shall provide concerned parents with adequate and relevant scientific materials on the age-appropriate topics and manner of teaching reproductive health education to their children.
Is the State not yet contented with its meddling with parents'
primary right to teach their children on sexuality education?
Does the State still want to "indoctrinate" them with its suggested
ultra-liberal ideas and information (which may have come from
another country, not our own mother country) by providing them
with materials on the manner of teaching reproductive health
education to their children?
Sec 28(a)(2)
The following acts are prohibited: Any healthcare service provider, whether public or private, who shall refuse to extend health care services and information on account of the person's marital status, gender, sexual orientation, age, religion, personal circumstances, or nature of work.
On account of the person's age? Will the State imprison a
healthcare service provider, whether public or private, who will
refuse to give a 15-year-old girl with contraceptive pills on
account of the girl's young age? Will a nurse be imprisoned
because she will refuse to give an IUD to an 11-year old? Will
a doctor be imprisoned because he/she refuses to perform tubal
ligation to an under-aged girl, or vasectomy to a boy of minor age?
Will the public official or employee suffer the accessory penalty of
dismissal from the government service and forfeiture of
retirement benefits because, he/she will have to refuse to be a
part of the team who distributes condoms at a place near a
reputable elementary or high school on the 14th of February
(St. Valentine's Day)?
"Batang-Bata Ka Pa at Marami Ka Pang
Kailangang Malaman at Intindihin sa Mundo..."
No to Sex Education Bill.
No to RH Bill.
nice one!
ReplyDeletekaya nating itapon muli sa basurahan ang bill na ito..kahit ilang beses pa palitan ang pangalan..hehehe!
May God be with us all.. :))
...sharing this one,,
have a nice day!
No to Homosexual this people are the one who teaching our kids to be immoral not the RH bill.Even Lito Lapid now knows that RH Bill is safe.
ReplyDeletePlease do not blame homosexual people for immorality. I think that's just plain fallacy of assumption. Should there be homosexuals who truly teach immorality, please do not generalize. It can be construed as unjust discrimination.
DeleteI do not believe however that the RH Bill is safe. please see link: BAWAL RH BILL! MAY NAMATAY NA DITO. http://ifyouregoingtomakeablog.blogspot.com/2011/07/bawal-rh-bill-may-namatay-na-dito.html